No notifications yet
Open Class Action Settlements
Sort: Newest first
The lawsuit claims that Mylan and Pfizer made an illegal deal with Teva Pharmaceuticals, delaying the release of a cheaper generic version of the EpiPen. This allegedly let Pfizer and Mylan keep control over the market for the emergency allergy device longer than they should have. The case against Mylan is ongoing, separate from the settlement with Pfizer. No final decision has been made by the court about who is at fault. Pfizer denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to pay $50 million to settle the class action lawsuit related to EpiPen.
Consumers who bought brand name EpiPen products will receive more payment than those who bought generic versions. The final payment amount will depend on how many claims are submitted and the specific types of purchases each consumer claims. There are no payment estimates available right now.
Visit the Settlement's Court Documents page for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
Subscribe to our free newsletter right now.
The Grasley lawsuit is currently in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Winnebago County, Illinois, overseen by Judge Stephen E. Balogh. It represents a group of Illinois residents who owned or rented property near the Chemtool ManufactThe Grasley lawsuit is currently in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Winnebago County, Illinois, overseen by Judge Stephen E. Balogh. It represents a group of Illinois residents who owned or rented property near the Chemtool Manufacturing Plant in Rockton, Illinois, on June 14, 2021. These residents, known as the Class, claim that a fire at the plant that day caused damage to their properties due to smoke, dust, and debris. They allege that both Chemtool and Holian Insulation Company, a contractor at the plant, are responsible for this damage. The lawsuit seeks compensation for cleanup costs, loss of property value, and other damages, as well as measures to fix the harm caused. Chemtool and Holian deny the allegations and argue that the other party is to blame for the fire and damages. The court has not yet ruled on the validity of these claims or defenses.uring Plant in Rockton, Illinois, on June 14, 2021. These residents, known as the Class, claim that a fire at the plant that day caused damage to their properties due to smoke, dust, and debris. They allege that both Chemtool and Holian Insulation Company, a contractor at the plant, are responsible for this damage. The lawsuit seeks compensation for cleanup costs, loss of property value, and other damages, as well as measures to fix the harm caused. Chemtool and Holian deny the allegations and argue that the other party is to blame for the fire and damages. The court has not yet ruled on the validity of these claims or defenses.
Visit the Settlement's Important Case Documents page, as well as the FAQs page , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
The class action lawsuit alleges that the labels "fresh," "all natural," and "no preservatives" on Wahlburgers Pickles were deceptive because the products actually contained sodium benzoate. Wahlburgers denies any wrongdoing or liability but has agreed to settle the lawsuit for $2 million.
Under the settlement terms, class members can receive $2 for each purchased product without needing to show proof of purchase, with a maximum claim of $12 for up to six products. Those who can provide proof of purchase can claim reimbursement for all products purchased.
Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items 8 through 12, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
$2 to $12+No
A settlement has been reached in a class action case concerning certain Porsche infotainment systems (PCM 3.1 with XM satellite antenna) that experienced rebooting issues on or after May 20, 2020. Porsche maintains it did nothing wrong. The settlement aims to avoid a trial and compensate class members promptly. Eligible participants can receive reimbursement for expenses related to addressing PCM reboots, such as repairs, battery replacements, towing, and alternate transportation costs, up to $7,500. Alternatively, if you dealt with the rebooting problem but didn't incur expenses or lack documentation, you can choose between a $25 payment or a $50 credit at a Porsche dealership.
Certain Porsche models have a PCM 3.1 infotainment system, including the Panamera (2010-2016), Cayenne (2011-2016), 911 Carrera (2012-2016), Boxster (2012-2016), Cayman (2012-2016), and Macan (2015-2016), provided they also have an XM satellite radio antenna installed.
To check if your vehicle qualifies for the settlement, you can find your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) located on the driver's side dashboard or door post, as well as on your registration and insurance cards. Enter your VIN in the respective field on the given Settlement website. Click the blue "Look Up VIN" button to proceed.
Up to $7,500Yes
Plaintiff, a company that owned a restaurant and was a client of Southern, filed a lawsuit accusing Southern of breaking California liquor laws by imposing a late payment fee of 2% per month instead of the required 1% per month. Representing Plaintiff are attorneys Robert Green from Green & Noblin, P.C., and Matthew Hess from the Law Office of Matthew Hess.
Southern denies any wrongdoing and insists it followed all applicable laws. Currently, the court has not decided who is right in this matter. In the meantime, both Plaintiff and Southern hired a neutral mediator to try and settle the case outside of court to avoid the costs and time involved in a full legal process. Their negotiations were successful, resulting in a detailed settlement agreement ("Agreement"). Plaintiff and Southern agreed to ask the court to approve this settlement, which includes Southern paying a sum they believe fairly compensates for the claims made, forgiving any outstanding late charges, revising future contracts to limit such charges, and overall benefiting the members of the class affected by these issues. The court has preliminarily approved this proposed settlement as fair and reasonable and has scheduled a hearing for final approval.
Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items 3 through 5, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesN/A
A class action lawsuit revolves around a data security breach that occurred in September 2022 involving Bay Bridge Administrators, LLC ("Bay Bridge" or the "Defendant"). It was discovered that an unauthorized third party potentially accessed specific files on Bay Bridge’s network, containing sensitive personal details of employees from Bay Bridge customers. This compromised information includes names, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, driver’s license or state ID numbers, medical, and health information. Bay Bridge, while denying any misconduct or liability, has opted to settle the lawsuit on behalf of the entire class affected. Visit the Settlement's Case Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items #7 through 11, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesN/A
Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit alleged that Toyota knowingly sold Rav4 SUVs with defective battery terminals, placing the financial burden of replacements and repairs on drivers. These faulty terminals were blamed for causing power loss, vehicle stalling, and instances of engine compartment fires. Toyota has agreed to settle claims that certain Rav4 SUVs were equipped with faulty batteries, potentially leading to power loss or fires, but without admitting any wrongdoing. The settlement involves an undisclosed financial payment. As part of the settlement terms, affected drivers are eligible for a complimentary battery inspection and reimbursement for expenses incurred due to issues with battery replacements and repairs caused by specific thermal vents. The settlement also includes an inspection program to ensure that the batteries in class member vehicles are of the correct size. If any securing components are found damaged or missing during these inspections, they will be replaced at no cost. Additionally, there is a reimbursement program offering up to $75 for past battery purchases. Those who received a $32 discount under Consumer Advisory 21TG01 can claim $43, while those who did not receive the discount or purchased a battery from a Toyota dealer after a specified date can claim up to $75. Reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to thermal events will also be available, with amounts varying based on documented costs incurred. Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items #9 through 16, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
You are included in this Settlement if you purchased one or more units of any Seresto Product on or before July 8, 2024. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. In particular, you may also review “The Settlement Benefits” on the FAQs page, Item #8 , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
The lawsuit involves Kirkland Signature Moist Flushable Wipes (i.e., the “Product”), notably the contestable nature of the product labeled as “flushable”. The lawsuit asserts that the price of the Product would have been lower if Costco had not engaged in the labeling, marketing, and advertising as reported by the Plaintiff, Dr. Kurtz. The Plaintiff seeks to recover the dollar amount of the price premium related to the alleged misrepresentations as well as claims for property damage that the Plaintiff alleges to have incurred due to using Costco’s flushable wipes. The Court has not determined who is right; however, the Parties have agreed to a settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. You may also review this document, notably page 4, Subsection headlined, “What Can I Get In The Settlement?” for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
Plaintiffs Meganne Natale and Chelsea Cheng (collectively, the “Class Representatives”) allege that they were misled by 9199-4467 Quebec Inc. d/b/a Earth Rated (“Earth Rated”) into believing that their Product, Earth Rated Certified Compostable Poop Bags (the “Certified Compostable Poop Bags”) were “compostable.” Earth Rated deny all accusations of wrongdoing. The Court has not determined who is right; however, the Parties have agreed to a settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation. You are included in this Settlement if you purchased one or more units of Certified Compostable Poop Bags between October 28, 2015, and June 13, 2024, and are thus eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund of $2.00 per unit of Certified Compostable Poop Bag purchased, up to $6.00 if you are without proof of purchase, and $2.00 per unit of Certified Compostable Poop Bag purchased, subject to no cap if you have proof of purchase. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. You may also review this document, notably page 3, Items #7-9 , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
The Defendant, Sports Research Corporation (“Sports Research”), allegedly misled consumers because they labeled their Garcinia Cambogia Product claiming “weight management,” “appetite suppression” and/or “appetite control” even if they cannot actually provide said benefits. The Defendant denies the lawsuit’s allegations and any malpractice, but they have agreed to a settlement to lay the claims to rest and avoid litigation costs. In exchange for a waiver and release of their claims, the participating class members will be provided with monetary relief, as detailed below. If you take part in the Settlement, you waive and release any claims against Sports Research regarding the labeling and marketing of the Product. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Documents sections for more details.
$20No
The lawsuit claims that Mylan and Pfizer made an illegal deal with Teva Pharmaceuticals, delaying the release of a cheaper generic version of the EpiPen. This allegedly let Pfizer and Mylan keep control over the market for the emergency allergy device longer than they should have. The case against Mylan is ongoing, separate from the settlement with Pfizer. No final decision has been made by the court about who is at fault. Pfizer denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to pay $50 million to settle the class action lawsuit related to EpiPen.
Consumers who bought brand name EpiPen products will receive more payment than those who bought generic versions. The final payment amount will depend on how many claims are submitted and the specific types of purchases each consumer claims. There are no payment estimates available right now.
Visit the Settlement's Court Documents page for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
The Grasley lawsuit is currently in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Winnebago County, Illinois, overseen by Judge Stephen E. Balogh. It represents a group of Illinois residents who owned or rented property near the Chemtool ManufactThe Grasley lawsuit is currently in the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in Winnebago County, Illinois, overseen by Judge Stephen E. Balogh. It represents a group of Illinois residents who owned or rented property near the Chemtool Manufacturing Plant in Rockton, Illinois, on June 14, 2021. These residents, known as the Class, claim that a fire at the plant that day caused damage to their properties due to smoke, dust, and debris. They allege that both Chemtool and Holian Insulation Company, a contractor at the plant, are responsible for this damage. The lawsuit seeks compensation for cleanup costs, loss of property value, and other damages, as well as measures to fix the harm caused. Chemtool and Holian deny the allegations and argue that the other party is to blame for the fire and damages. The court has not yet ruled on the validity of these claims or defenses.uring Plant in Rockton, Illinois, on June 14, 2021. These residents, known as the Class, claim that a fire at the plant that day caused damage to their properties due to smoke, dust, and debris. They allege that both Chemtool and Holian Insulation Company, a contractor at the plant, are responsible for this damage. The lawsuit seeks compensation for cleanup costs, loss of property value, and other damages, as well as measures to fix the harm caused. Chemtool and Holian deny the allegations and argue that the other party is to blame for the fire and damages. The court has not yet ruled on the validity of these claims or defenses.
Visit the Settlement's Important Case Documents page, as well as the FAQs page , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
Subscribe to our free newsletter right now.
The class action lawsuit alleges that the labels "fresh," "all natural," and "no preservatives" on Wahlburgers Pickles were deceptive because the products actually contained sodium benzoate. Wahlburgers denies any wrongdoing or liability but has agreed to settle the lawsuit for $2 million.
Under the settlement terms, class members can receive $2 for each purchased product without needing to show proof of purchase, with a maximum claim of $12 for up to six products. Those who can provide proof of purchase can claim reimbursement for all products purchased.
Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items 8 through 12, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
$2 to $12+No
A settlement has been reached in a class action case concerning certain Porsche infotainment systems (PCM 3.1 with XM satellite antenna) that experienced rebooting issues on or after May 20, 2020. Porsche maintains it did nothing wrong. The settlement aims to avoid a trial and compensate class members promptly. Eligible participants can receive reimbursement for expenses related to addressing PCM reboots, such as repairs, battery replacements, towing, and alternate transportation costs, up to $7,500. Alternatively, if you dealt with the rebooting problem but didn't incur expenses or lack documentation, you can choose between a $25 payment or a $50 credit at a Porsche dealership.
Certain Porsche models have a PCM 3.1 infotainment system, including the Panamera (2010-2016), Cayenne (2011-2016), 911 Carrera (2012-2016), Boxster (2012-2016), Cayman (2012-2016), and Macan (2015-2016), provided they also have an XM satellite radio antenna installed.
To check if your vehicle qualifies for the settlement, you can find your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) located on the driver's side dashboard or door post, as well as on your registration and insurance cards. Enter your VIN in the respective field on the given Settlement website. Click the blue "Look Up VIN" button to proceed.
Up to $7,500Yes
Plaintiff, a company that owned a restaurant and was a client of Southern, filed a lawsuit accusing Southern of breaking California liquor laws by imposing a late payment fee of 2% per month instead of the required 1% per month. Representing Plaintiff are attorneys Robert Green from Green & Noblin, P.C., and Matthew Hess from the Law Office of Matthew Hess.
Southern denies any wrongdoing and insists it followed all applicable laws. Currently, the court has not decided who is right in this matter. In the meantime, both Plaintiff and Southern hired a neutral mediator to try and settle the case outside of court to avoid the costs and time involved in a full legal process. Their negotiations were successful, resulting in a detailed settlement agreement ("Agreement"). Plaintiff and Southern agreed to ask the court to approve this settlement, which includes Southern paying a sum they believe fairly compensates for the claims made, forgiving any outstanding late charges, revising future contracts to limit such charges, and overall benefiting the members of the class affected by these issues. The court has preliminarily approved this proposed settlement as fair and reasonable and has scheduled a hearing for final approval.
Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items 3 through 5, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesN/A
A class action lawsuit revolves around a data security breach that occurred in September 2022 involving Bay Bridge Administrators, LLC ("Bay Bridge" or the "Defendant"). It was discovered that an unauthorized third party potentially accessed specific files on Bay Bridge’s network, containing sensitive personal details of employees from Bay Bridge customers. This compromised information includes names, dates of birth, Social Security Numbers, driver’s license or state ID numbers, medical, and health information. Bay Bridge, while denying any misconduct or liability, has opted to settle the lawsuit on behalf of the entire class affected. Visit the Settlement's Case Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items #7 through 11, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesN/A
Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit alleged that Toyota knowingly sold Rav4 SUVs with defective battery terminals, placing the financial burden of replacements and repairs on drivers. These faulty terminals were blamed for causing power loss, vehicle stalling, and instances of engine compartment fires. Toyota has agreed to settle claims that certain Rav4 SUVs were equipped with faulty batteries, potentially leading to power loss or fires, but without admitting any wrongdoing. The settlement involves an undisclosed financial payment. As part of the settlement terms, affected drivers are eligible for a complimentary battery inspection and reimbursement for expenses incurred due to issues with battery replacements and repairs caused by specific thermal vents. The settlement also includes an inspection program to ensure that the batteries in class member vehicles are of the correct size. If any securing components are found damaged or missing during these inspections, they will be replaced at no cost. Additionally, there is a reimbursement program offering up to $75 for past battery purchases. Those who received a $32 discount under Consumer Advisory 21TG01 can claim $43, while those who did not receive the discount or purchased a battery from a Toyota dealer after a specified date can claim up to $75. Reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to thermal events will also be available, with amounts varying based on documented costs incurred. Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items #9 through 16, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesYes
You are included in this Settlement if you purchased one or more units of any Seresto Product on or before July 8, 2024. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. In particular, you may also review “The Settlement Benefits” on the FAQs page, Item #8 , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
The lawsuit involves Kirkland Signature Moist Flushable Wipes (i.e., the “Product”), notably the contestable nature of the product labeled as “flushable”. The lawsuit asserts that the price of the Product would have been lower if Costco had not engaged in the labeling, marketing, and advertising as reported by the Plaintiff, Dr. Kurtz. The Plaintiff seeks to recover the dollar amount of the price premium related to the alleged misrepresentations as well as claims for property damage that the Plaintiff alleges to have incurred due to using Costco’s flushable wipes. The Court has not determined who is right; however, the Parties have agreed to a settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. You may also review this document, notably page 4, Subsection headlined, “What Can I Get In The Settlement?” for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
Plaintiffs Meganne Natale and Chelsea Cheng (collectively, the “Class Representatives”) allege that they were misled by 9199-4467 Quebec Inc. d/b/a Earth Rated (“Earth Rated”) into believing that their Product, Earth Rated Certified Compostable Poop Bags (the “Certified Compostable Poop Bags”) were “compostable.” Earth Rated deny all accusations of wrongdoing. The Court has not determined who is right; however, the Parties have agreed to a settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with ongoing litigation. You are included in this Settlement if you purchased one or more units of Certified Compostable Poop Bags between October 28, 2015, and June 13, 2024, and are thus eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement Fund of $2.00 per unit of Certified Compostable Poop Bag purchased, up to $6.00 if you are without proof of purchase, and $2.00 per unit of Certified Compostable Poop Bag purchased, subject to no cap if you have proof of purchase. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Important Documents sections for more information. You may also review this document, notably page 3, Items #7-9 , for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
VariesNo
The Defendant, Sports Research Corporation (“Sports Research”), allegedly misled consumers because they labeled their Garcinia Cambogia Product claiming “weight management,” “appetite suppression” and/or “appetite control” even if they cannot actually provide said benefits. The Defendant denies the lawsuit’s allegations and any malpractice, but they have agreed to a settlement to lay the claims to rest and avoid litigation costs. In exchange for a waiver and release of their claims, the participating class members will be provided with monetary relief, as detailed below. If you take part in the Settlement, you waive and release any claims against Sports Research regarding the labeling and marketing of the Product. Visit the Settlement's FAQs and Documents sections for more details.
$20No
The class action lawsuit alleges that the labels "fresh," "all natural," and "no preservatives" on Wahlburgers Pickles were deceptive because the products actually contained sodium benzoate. Wahlburgers denies any wrongdoing or liability but has agreed to settle the lawsuit for $2 million.
Under the settlement terms, class members can receive $2 for each purchased product without needing to show proof of purchase, with a maximum claim of $12 for up to six products. Those who can provide proof of purchase can claim reimbursement for all products purchased.
Visit the Settlement's Important Documents page for more information, as well as the FAQs page , notably Items 8 through 12, for more details on the settlement benefits that Class Members can claim.
$2 to $12+No
Subscribe to our free newsletter right now.
Subscribe to our free newsletter right now.
You have successfully subscribed for