Nortel Network Equipment Class Action Settlement

Class Eligibility

All persons, including businesses, in the United States of America and its territories who, between January 1, 2001, through June 30, 2004, entered into a written agreement with NorVergence, Inc. for the lease of one or more Matrix boxes, Matrix SoHo boxes, or other network equipment provided by NorVergence, Inc.

Estimated Amount


This is a pro rata settlement. The pool will be divided among qualified claims

Proof of Purchase


Case Name

Wanland & Associates, Inc. v.
Nortel Networks Corporation, et al.

Case No. 3:05-cv-01191-MLC-TJB.
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Case Summary

This putative consumer fraud class action was filed over twelve years ago. The allegedly wrongful conduct that underlies this matter occurred fifteen years ago, in 2001. In essence, plaintiff Wanland & Associates (“Plaintiff”) has alleged that all defendants, as well as third party NorVergence, Inc. (“NorVergence”), defrauded numerous businesses by inducing them to enter into leases for “Matrix boxes” and other equipment in connection with the purchase of telecommunications services without disclosing that the leases purported to create an absolute obligation to pay regardless of whether services were actually rendered, and even though the value of the leased equipment was allegedly less than the lease price.

Settlement Pool





Wanland & Associates, Inc. v.

Nortel Networks Corp., et al.

Settlement Administrator

P.O. Box 43446

Providence, RI 02940-3446


Кракен даркнетКракен даркнет blacksprut blacksprut