Pella Windows ProLine Class Action Settlement

Class Eligibility

You are a member of the class if you are a person(s) in the United States who are current or former owners of Structures containing Pella ProLine® brand aluminum clad wood casement, awning and/or transom windows (including 250 and 450 Series) manufactured by Pella Corporation between 1991 and 2009.

Estimated Amount


If you timely submit a complete and valid Claim Form, satisfy all of the requirements to become an Eligible Claimant,, and paid for Eligible Damage for which you were not fully reimbursed, you are entitled to receive cash for actual expenditures and expenses necessary to address the Eligible Damage to or from the Window (and to surrounding property) from Fund A.

Cash awards will be for the following four categories:

    The cost of the product (per window or sash);
    The cost of the installation labor (per window or sash);
    The cost of finishing (per window or sash); and
    The cost to repair damage to other property.

Proof of Purchase


Case Name

Eubank, et al. v. Pella Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 1:06-cv-04481

District Court for the Northern District Illinois, Eastern Division

Case Summary

Plaintiffs allege Pella ProLine® Casement Windows manufactured by Pella Corporation contain defects that have caused water intrusion resulting in damage to the windows and/or Plaintiffs’ property; that some Pella ProLine® Casement Window owners have paid for repairs or replacements of these windows and property; and that some owners currently require or may in the future require repairs or replacements of these windows and property. The Lawsuit asserts claims against Defendants for violation of Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and substantially similar laws of certain other States, and declaratory relief based on alleged defects that have caused or will continue to cause damage to owners’ homes or personal property allegedly resulting from water-related intrusion. Defendants deny Plaintiffs’ allegations of wrongdoing and assert numerous defenses to Plaintiffs’ claims.

The Court has made no determination about the strengths or weaknesses of any of Plaintiffs’ contentions or any of Defendants’ defenses. Instead, Plaintiffs and Defendants have entered into a settlement to end the litigation. The Court has preliminarily approved a nationwide settlement.

Settlement Pool





Eubank v. Pella Corporation Window Settlement Administrator

c/o Kurtzman Carson Consultants

P.O. Box 404041

Louisville, KY 40233-4041